From 3 Hours to 15 Minutes: How AI Transformed How I Review Transcripts

Heres how I use AI to obtain a 200+ page transcript in less than 15 minutes.

Learn more about how we use AI at Signal Lawyers and Lawtrepreneur by reading our AI Usage Operating Framework.

---

It's 9 PM, you're staring at a 200-page transcript, and you need to extract the key evidence for a hearing coming up.

Your family's waiting for you upstairs, but this work isn't going to do itself.

Every litigator with a family is familiar with this scenario.

Until a few years, I too was very familiar with these challenges.

However more recently, I’ve been using AI to help me get 85% of a transcript reviewed in under 30 minutes.

That's exactly what I demonstrated in the video above, using nothing more than Claude AI and a systematic approach I've refined over years of practice.

But this isn't about replacing your legal judgment.

It's about reclaiming your time while maintaining the thorough analysis your clients deserve.

Why Most Lawyers Are Drowning in Document Review

The traditional approach to discovery review follows the same pattern we learned in law school: read everything, highlight everything, summarize everything manually.

It's thorough, but it's also:

• Time-intensive: Hours spent on work that could be streamlined

• Repetitive: The same analytical process applied to every transcript

• Isolating: Late nights alone with documents instead of time with family

• Exhausting: Mental energy drained on prep work rather than strategy

The result?

You're working harder, not smarter, and your practice is running you instead of supporting your life.

The Role of AI

AI is incredibly powerful in recognizing patterns quickly. This is especially so when it comes to legal file management.

I’ve been able to use AI to be between 30 - 85% more efficient; efficiencies that allow me to:

• Reclaim family time without sacrificing client service

• Take on more cases without working longer hours

• Reduce stress by eliminating the "document review dread"

• Improve accuracy through systematic analysis rather than fatigue-induced errors

That being said, this tool is not infallible. In my experience:

• the analysis is highly accurate 70-90% of the time

• 10-15% of the time, you'll find gaps or errors

• Occasionally, the initial pass misses significant evidence

That's why all content must be verified and scrutinized before used.

Remember you're still the lawyer. You're still responsible for accuracy. But now you have a sophisticated first draft to work from instead of a blank page.

Learn more about how we use AI at Signal Lawyers and Lawtrepreneur by reading AI Usage Operating Framework.

Training AI as Your Research Assistant

If you want to replicate these results in your practice, here are some tips: